Sort by year Sort by type


2015

B. Verheij, F.J. Bex, S.T. Timmer, C. Vlek, J.J.-Ch Meyer, S. Renooij, & H. Prakken (2015). Arguments, Scenarios and Probabilities: Connections Between Three Normative Frameworks for Evidential Reasoning. Law, Probability & Risk, to appear.

F.J. Bex (2015) An integrated theory of causal scenarios and evidential arguments. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York: ACM Press, to appear [PDF]

2014

F.J. Bex, K. Atkinson & T. Bench-Capon (2014) Arguments as a new perspective on character motive in stories. Literary and Linguistic Computing 29 (4). pp. 467 – 487. [PDF]

F.J. Bex (2014) Towards an integrated theory of causal scenarios and evidential arguments. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 266. pp. 133 – 140. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, J. Lawrence & C. Reed (2014) Generalising argument dialogue with the Dialogue Game Execution Platform. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 266. pp. 141 – 152. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & T. Bench-Capon (2014) Understanding Narratives with Argumentation. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 266. pp. 11 – 18. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

P. Bosma, H. de Haan, A. van der Veen, F.J. Bex & H. de Weerd (2014) The role of communication in cooperative hunting in a partially observable world. Proceedings of the 23rd Belgian-Dutch conference on machine-learning (Benelearn 2014). [PDF]

F.J. Bex, J. Lawrence, M. Snaith & C. Reed. (2014) ArguBlogging: An Application for the Argument Web. Journal of Web Semantics 25, pp. 9–15. [PDF]


2013

F.J. Bex, J. Lawrence, M. Snaith & C. Reed. (2013) Implementing the Argument Web. Communications of the ACM 56(10): 66-73. [PDF]

F.J. Bex (2013) Values as the point of a story. In K. Atkinson, H. Prakken & A. Wyner (eds.) From Knowledge Representation to Argumentation in AI, Law and Policy Making. A Festschrift in Honour of Trevor Bench-Capon, pp. 63-78. College Publications, London. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & B. Verheij (2013) Legal Stories and the Process of Proof. Artificial Intelligence and Law 21(3): 253-278. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, S. Modgil, H. Prakken & C. Reed (2013) On Logical Specifications of the Argument Interchange Format. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23 (5): 951-989 [PDF]

F.J. Bex (2013) Abductive Argumentation with Stories. ICAIL-2013 Workshop on Formal Aspects of Evidential Inference, Rome (Italy). [PDF]

F.J. Bex & T. Bench-Capon (2013) Arguing with Stories. Selected papers from the 2011-2013 Workshops on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer. To appear. [PDF]


2012

F.J. Bex & D. Walton (2012) Burdens and Standards of Proof for Inference to the Best Explanation: Three Case Studies. Law, Probability and Risk 11 (2-3): 113-133. [PDF]

T. Bench-Capon, M. Araszkiewicz, K. Ashley, K. Atkinson, F. Bex, F. Borges, D. Bourcier, D. Bourgine, J.G. Conrad, E. Francesconi, T.F. Gordon, G. Governatori, J.L. Leidner, D.D. Lewis, R.P. Loui, L.T. McCarty, H. Prakken, F. Schilder, E. Schweighofer, P. Thompson, A. Tyrrell, B. Verheij, D.N. Walton & A.Z. Wyner (2012) A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 20(3):215-319. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & B. Verheij (2012) Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. Argumentation, 26:3, 325-353. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, T. Bench-Capon & B. Verheij (2012) Persuasive Precedents. LREC-2012 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative . [PDF]

F.J. Bex, C. Reed (2012) Dialogue Templates for Automatic Argument Processing. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245: 366-377. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, T. Gordon & C. Reed (2012) Interchanging between Carneades and AIF - Theory and Practice. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245: 390-397. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

J. Lawrence, F.J. Bex, M. Snaith & C. Reed (2012) AIFdb: Infrastructure for the Argument Web. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245: 515-316. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

J. Lawrence, F.J. Bex & C. Reed (2012) Dialogues on the Argument Web - Mixed Initiative Argumentation with Arvina. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245: 513-514. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

M. Snaith, F.J. Bex, J. Lawrence & C. Reed (2012) Implementing Argublogging (2012) Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2012, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 245: 511-512. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

S. Modgil, F. Toni, F. Bex, I. Bratko, C. I. Chesñevar, W. Dvořák and M. A. Falappa, S.A. Gaggl, A.J. Garcia, M.P. Gonzalez, T.F. Gordon, J. Leite, M. Mozina, C. Reed, G.R. Simari, S. Szeider, P. Torroni, S. Woltran (2012) The Added Value of Argumentation: Examples and Challenges. In Handbook on Agreement Technologies (COST Action IC0801), Springer.

F. Bex & D. Walton (2012) Combining Explanation and Argumentation in Dialogue. Selected papers from the 2011-2013 Workshops on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer. To appear. [PDF]

F.J. Bex (2012) Bespreking van W.I. Koelewijn's "Privacy en politiegegevens". RM Themis, 2012: 3 (juni), Uitgeverij Paris, Zutphen.


2011

F.J. Bex & C. Reed (2011) Schemes of Inference, Conflict, and Preference in a Computational Model of Argument, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 23(36). [PDF]

J. Visser, F.J. Bex, C. Reed & B. Garssen (2011) Correspondence between the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Model and the Argument Interchange Format, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 23(36). [PDF]

F.J. Bex (2011) Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence: A Formal Hybrid Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. [website]

F.J. Bex, T. Bench-Capon & B. Verheij (2011) What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The Twenty Fourth Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 235. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & B. Verheij (2011) Legal Shifts in the Process of Proof. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: ACM Press. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & D. Walton (2011) Evidential Reasoning with Burdens of Proof: Some Case Studies. Workshop on AI & Evidence (ICAIL 2011).


2010

F.J. Bex, P.J. van Koppen, H. Prakken & B. Verheij (2010) A Hybrid Formal Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18:2, 123-152. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & D. Walton (2010) Burdens and Standards of Proof for Inference to the Best Explanation. In R. Winkels (ed.): Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2010: The 23rd Annual Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 223: 37-46. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & B. Verheij (2010) Arguments, stories and evidence: critical questions for fact-finding. In van Eemeren, F.H. et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2010), Sic Sat, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & B. Verheij (2010) Story schemes for argumentation about the facts of a crime. Proceedings of the 2010 AAAI Fall Symposium on Computatonal Narratives. AAAI Technical Report FS-10-04, AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & T. Bench-Capon (2010) Persuasive Stories for Multi-Agent Argumentation. Proceedings of the 2010 AAAI Fall Symposium on Computatonal Narratives. AAAI Technical Report FS-10-04, AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, H. Prakken & C.A. Reed (2010) A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin & G.R. Simari (eds.): Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 216: 99-110. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, B. Verheij (2010) Het onderbouwen van een feitelijk oordeel in een strafzaak: methode, casus, aanbevelingen. In P.J. van Koppen, H. Merkelbach, M. Jelicic en J.W. de Keijser (eds.) Reizen met mijn Rechter – de Psychologie van het Recht, 935-952, Kluwer, Deventer. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & K. Budzynska (2010) Argument and explanation as contexts of reasoning. CMNA 2010 - Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (ECAI 2010). [PDF]

C. Reed, S. Wells, F. Bex, K. Budzynska, J. Devereux & J. Lawrence (2010) The Argument Interchange Format: Consolidation & Extensions. University of Dundee Technical Report.


2009

F. Bex, T. Bench-Capon and K. Atkinson (2009) Did he jump or was he pushed? Abductive practical reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 17:2, pp.79-99. [PDF]

F.J. Bex & Atkinson, K. (2009). A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law 212-213. New York: ACM Press. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, T. Bench Capon & K. Atkinson (2009) Evidential Reasoning about Motives: a Case Study. Workshop on Modelling Legal Cases (ICAIL 2009), Huygens Editorial, Barcelona. [PDF]

F.J. Bex (2009) Analyzing Stories Using Schemes. In H. Kaptein, H. Prakken & B. Verheij (eds.) Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Ashgate Publishing (Applied Legal Philosophy Series) Aldershot. [PDF]

B.Verheij & F.J. Bex (2009) Accepting the truth of a story about the facts of a criminal case. In H. Kaptein, H. Prakken & B. Verheij (eds.) Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Ashgate Publishing (Applied Legal Philosophy Series) Aldershot. [PDF]


2008 and older

F. Bex, T. Bench-Capon & K. Atkinson (2008) Did he jump or was he pushed? Abductive practical reasoning. In E. Francesconi, G. Sartor and D. Tiscornia (eds.): Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2008: The Twenty First Annual Conference.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 189:138-149. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, H. Prakken (2008) Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2008 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 172:73-84. IOS Press, Amsterdam. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, S.W. van den Braak, H. van Oostendorp, H. Prakken, H.B. Verheij & G.A.W. Vreeswijk (2007) Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probability & Risk 6:145-168 [PDF]

F.J. Bex, H. Prakken & B. Verheij (2007) Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 1-10. New York: ACM Press. Winner of the Donald Berman Best Student Paper Award. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, H. Prakken & B. Verheij (2006) Anchored narratives in reasoning about evidence. In T.M. van Engers (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 152: 11-20. Amsterdam etc, IOS Press. [PDF]

P. Dijkstra, F.J. Bex, H. Prakken & C.N.J. De Vey Mestdagh (2005) Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13:133-151 [PDF]

P. Dijkstra, F.J. Bex, H. Prakken & C.N.J. De Vey Mestdagh (2005) Outline of a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations. Proceedings of the ICAIL-05 workshop on Argumentation in A.I. and Law, IAAIL Workshop series, 2:27-37. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen.

F.J. Bex & H. Prakken (2004) Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning. In T.F. Gordon (ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference, 119-129. Amsterdam etc, IOS Press. [PDF]

F.J. Bex, H. Prakken, C. Reed & D.N. Walton (2003) Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11:125-165 [PDF]